silikongps.blogg.se

1. #TEXAS INSTRUMENTS ENGINEERING CALCULATOR MANUALS#
2. #TEXAS INSTRUMENTS ENGINEERING CALCULATOR MANUAL#

TI Programmable Program Record (multilingual) (©1977, Texas Instruments scan courtesy of Michael J.TI-58/59 Korte Naslaggids (In Dutch ©1977, Texas Instruments scan courtesy of Andre Steenveld).TI-58/59 Aide Mémoire (In French ©1977, 1979, Texas Instruments scan courtesy of Pierre Houbert).TI-58/59 additional miscellaneous material (scan courtesy of Pierre Houbert).TI-58/59 miscellaneous documentation (scan courtesy of Andre Steenveld).TI Programmable 57 Reference Guide (©1977, Texas Instruments scan courtesy of Claus Buchholz).TI-57 Program Record (©Texas Instruments scan courtesy of Michael J.SR-56 Coding Form (©1976, Texas Instruments scan courtesy of Peter Engels.SR-56 Applications Library (©1976, Texas Instruments).

#TEXAS INSTRUMENTS ENGINEERING CALCULATOR MANUAL#

PC-100C Owner's Manual (multilingual) (©1978, Texas Instruments scan courtesy of Pierre Houbert).PC-100C Print/Security Cradle Owner's Manual (©1978, Texas Instruments scan courtesy of Marek Czeszek).PC-100A Print/Security Cradle Owner's Manual (©1976, Texas Instruments).All this material remains the copyrighted property of Texas Instruments and/or their respective authors and must not be republished or otherwise reproduced without their permission.

#TEXAS INSTRUMENTS ENGINEERING CALCULATOR MANUALS#

Here are the manuals that I have so far managed to scan. Teachers prefer to have all students use the same basic kind of calculator because it makes teaching easier, and most standardized tests prohibit the use of more powerful calculators.I have recently obtained permission from Texas Instruments to post scans of pre-1984 calculator documentation here. One explanation for this continued consumer loyalty is that the TI-83 and TI-84 models are still an ideal product for the high school classroom.

People who buy graphing calculators expressed their preference for the traditional versions and kept purchasing them, while sales of the Nspire were less than inspiring. Some also said that the Nspire platform restricted user ability to write the kinds of programs they were accustomed to designing and sharing. The product was intended as an improvement over the traditional graphing calculator, with a higher price tag and new features like the ability to create spreadsheets.īut its platform was more like a computer than a traditional handheld calculator, and many consumers complained that it was too complicated and too expensive. The experience that the company had when it introduced its TI-Nspire graphing calculator a few years ago may provide an obvious answer. Many wonder, of course, why TI has not kept up with the times and made its graphing calculators more high-tech.

That is a huge contribution to the bottom line of TI, particularly considering how little the company invests in that segment. The relatively small category was responsible for $2.6 billion in revenues in 2013, representing 21 percent of total revenue. “Although there are some differences in the various business models that comprise this segment, in general, most of these products have a profit contribution that is attractive but where our investments are minimal and growth expectations are lower.”